No, no connection at all between Saddam Hussein and Al-Quaida and other terrorist groups. None whatsoever.
Except for this little tidbit.

It appears that the Fedayeen Saddam, a vicious paramilitary force run by Saddam’s eldest son Uday, has spearheaded the terrorist campaign using the alliances Saddam built up with terrorist groups from Ansar Al Islam to Al-Qaida to groups based in Syria as proxies.

Then there’s the part about Saddam leading the resistance. Democrats trying to spin Saddam’s capture into an insignificant event would do well to shut their traps before they dig themselves deeper into a hole of irrelevance and useless blather. Observe.

[The anonymous source] corroborated information from Governing Council sources that Saddam was indeed the primary financier of the resistance. Much of the resistance, said the agent, one of whose tasks was to monitor and control the internal enemies, pinned its hopes on Saddam. Without him as a rallying point the resistance will slowly die down.

Is it nice being wrong all the time? Are there perks that come with being on the losing side of things so consistently?